The Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, here, has ordered the SBI to repay a deceased depositor's Fixed Deposit (FD) maturity proceeds and pay compensation to his son, for failing to release the money citing missing records.
PP George of Vyttila, Ernakulam, in his complaint, stated that his late father PV Peter had deposited Rs 39,000 as an FD at the State Bank of Travancore (SBT), Vyttila branch, in 1989.
Following his father's death in June 2022, George approached SBI, into which SBT was later merged, to claim the deposit. However, the bank declined to release the amount, citing that the relevant records were unavailable due to the bank's merger.
George then approached the Consumer Commission seeking relief. He produced the original fixed deposit receipt, Aadhaar card, birth certificate, death certificate, and correspondence with the bank as evidence.
The commission observed that even if deposits unclaimed for over ten years are transferred by banks to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as per the norms, the depositor's or heir's right to claim the money does not lapse.
It further held that banks are obligated to settle the claim with the customer and later seek reimbursement from the RBI, as per existing circulars.
"A FD receipt is not merely an accounting record; it represents a family's savings and trust. Consumers cannot be denied their rightful claims due to internal procedural lapses of banks," the bench observed.
The bench comprising President DB Binu and members V Ramachandran and TN Srividya noted that unclaimed deposits worth over Rs 67,000 crore remain with various banks across the country.
It directed the bank to refund the FD amount of Rs 39,000, along with applicable interest as per RBI/SBI norms. It also directed the bank to pay Rs 50,000 as compensation for mental agony and Rs 5,000 towards litigation expenses to the petitioner within 45 days.
PP George of Vyttila, Ernakulam, in his complaint, stated that his late father PV Peter had deposited Rs 39,000 as an FD at the State Bank of Travancore (SBT), Vyttila branch, in 1989.
Following his father's death in June 2022, George approached SBI, into which SBT was later merged, to claim the deposit. However, the bank declined to release the amount, citing that the relevant records were unavailable due to the bank's merger.
George then approached the Consumer Commission seeking relief. He produced the original fixed deposit receipt, Aadhaar card, birth certificate, death certificate, and correspondence with the bank as evidence.
The commission observed that even if deposits unclaimed for over ten years are transferred by banks to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as per the norms, the depositor's or heir's right to claim the money does not lapse.
It further held that banks are obligated to settle the claim with the customer and later seek reimbursement from the RBI, as per existing circulars.
"A FD receipt is not merely an accounting record; it represents a family's savings and trust. Consumers cannot be denied their rightful claims due to internal procedural lapses of banks," the bench observed.
The bench comprising President DB Binu and members V Ramachandran and TN Srividya noted that unclaimed deposits worth over Rs 67,000 crore remain with various banks across the country.
It directed the bank to refund the FD amount of Rs 39,000, along with applicable interest as per RBI/SBI norms. It also directed the bank to pay Rs 50,000 as compensation for mental agony and Rs 5,000 towards litigation expenses to the petitioner within 45 days.
You may also like
Stranded at 16,000 feet: Blizzard traps hundreds of Everest trekkers; watch
WhatsApp Rolls Out Exciting New Features: Live Photos, AI Themes, and Custom Video Call Backgrounds
SSC: SSC candidates can now view question papers and answers after the exam; Staff Selection Commission has implemented several reforms..
LIC Bima Sakhi Yojana: Earn ₹7,000 Monthly with LIC's Women Empowerment Scheme Promoting Financial Independence
Bihar Assembly polls: ECI likely to announce election dates today
